[x]
All Deviations

Shoutboard



PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN



I shoot commie guns and I'm damn proud to say that!



I love Mausers and products of the Mauser arsenal too!



I support the right to bear arms.



The sights are on top for a REASON.



I'll be around for a good long while.



Take me out, to the black. Tell 'em I ain't coming back. Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me...

Shoutbox

=Galahawk:iconGalahawk:
*shouts in my mind* Quietest way to shout. EVER!
Mon Jun 30, 2008, 11:43 PM
*LadyLuck89:iconLadyLuck89:
You make me wanna shout! *does a soulful shout*
Mon Jun 30, 2008, 9:28 PM
=PaulStrealer:iconPaulStrealer:
I'm shouting in a quiet tone.
Sun Jun 29, 2008, 2:47 PM
=LadyJinx:iconLadyJinx:
:evillaugh:
Tue Mar 25, 2008, 3:55 PM
*MatchstickART:iconMatchstickART:
Self parody week shout!
Wed Feb 27, 2008, 2:01 PM
!Markokphotography:iconMarkokphotography:
SHOUT
Wed Feb 27, 2008, 1:12 PM
=tori-margaret:icontori-margaret:
is the shouting what makes people believe I am loud... ever wonder how long you can talk for before the shouting cuts off? I have... wondering... pondering... it really sucks to know I don't have much to say and I'm just babbling and taking up space in yo
Thu Feb 21, 2008, 4:07 PM
=AmandaTheStampede:iconAmandaTheStampede:
no, not trout! D:
Thu Feb 21, 2008, 1:45 PM
=5-7x28mm:icon5-7x28mm:
:trout:
Wed Feb 13, 2008, 12:07 AM
=Galahawk:iconGalahawk:
SHOUT! :V
Tue Feb 12, 2008, 7:34 PM

Forum

Topic
Last Activity
2
Mar 25, 2008
0
Feb 4, 2008

Do you think a second American Civil War is likely following Obama's anti-America, anti-Liberty actions when he is elected?

62%
21 deviants said No
21%
7 deviants said Yes
18%
6 deviants said YOU'RE A FUCKING RACIST

And we now have Linux!

Journal Entry: Thu Jul 24, 2008, 11:30 AM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I FINALLY got Linux working with the internet again. I switched to Puppy Linux instead of Ubuntu and it worked almost instantly with my drivers for my USB dongle.

So now I'm back to using Linux, although I do still need to set up my printer and get the "look and feel" set up again too.

  • Mood: Joy
  • Listening to: My radio
  • Reading: Nothing.
  • Watching: nothing
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

This makes twice

Journal Entry: Thu Jul 17, 2008, 11:52 AM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today makes the second time the Secret Service showed up at my door, this time because I have a rifle and as a followup to the first time they came.

Someone is trying to stalk me on here, I'm willing to bet it's that teacher.

  • Mood: Neutral
  • Listening to: My radio
  • Reading: Nothing.
  • Watching: nothing
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

Something interesting I came across on H23

Journal Entry: Mon Jul 14, 2008, 5:42 PM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Many people think that nations with more firearms will have more murder and that banning firearms will reduce murder and other violence. This canard does not comport, however, with criminological research in the U.S. or elsewhere.

An extensive study that one of us (Keats) recently published with Canadian criminologist Gary Mauser confirms the negative results of two large-scale international studies over the past 15 years. ("Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide: A Review of International Evidence," Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, vol. 30, pages 651-694.)

These studies compared data from a large number of nations around the world. There were no instances of nations with high gun ownership having higher murder rates than nations with low gun ownership. If anything it was the reverse, for reasons discussed below.

For example, though Norway has far and away the highest firearm ownership per ca pita in Western Europe, it nevertheless has the lowest murder rate. Other nations with high firearms ownership and comparably low murder rates include Denmark, Greece, Switzerland, Germany and Austria. Holland has a 50 percent higher murder rate despite having the lowest rate of firearm ownership in Europe. And Luxembourg, despite its total handgun ban, has a murder rate that is nine times higher than countries such as Norway and Austria.

It turns out that in nations where guns are less available, criminals manage to get them anyway. After decades of ever-stricter gun controls, England banned handguns and confiscated them from all permit holders in 1997. Yet by 2000, England had the industrialized world's highest violent crime rate -- twice that of the U.S. Despite the confiscation of law-abiding Englishman's handguns, a 2002 report of England's National Crime Intelligence Service lamented that while "Britain has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, [i]t appears that anyone who wishes to obtain a firearm [illegally] will have little difficulty in doing so."

In the rare case in which gun bans work, murderers use other weapons. Eight decades of police-state enforcement of handgun prohibition have kept Russian gun ownership low, resulting in few gun murders. Yet Russia's murder rates have long been four times higher than those in the U.S. and 20 times higher than rates in countries such as Norway. Former Soviet nations like Lithuania also ban handguns and severely restrict other guns, yet have 10-15 times higher murder rates than European nations with much higher gun ownership.

Nor does the "more guns means more murder" belief square with our own experience. The earliest American figures, dating from just after World War II, showed both gun ownership and murder rates holding at low levels. Today our murder rates are almost identical, despite six decades of massive gun buying whereby Americans have come to own five times more guns than they did in 1946. The intervening years saw a dramatic increase in murder followed by a dramatic decrease. These trends had no relationship to gun ownership, which steadily rose all the while (especially handgun ownership).

American demographic data also refute the myth that fewer guns in a community mean less murder. The murder rate among African-Americans is six times higher than among whites. Does this mean African-Americans have more guns? No, ordinary law abiding African-Americans are markedly less likely than whites to own guns. But the argument for banning guns to everyone is refuted, since fewer guns for law abiding African-Americans does not mean fewer guns for African-American criminals. Incidentally, rural African-Americans own guns as frequently as whites, but the murder rate among them is only a tiny fraction of the urban African-American rate.

Regardless of race, the distinction between good people and criminals is vital. It is utterly false that most murderers are ordinary people who went wrong because they had guns. Almost all murderers have life histories of violence, restraining orders, substance abuse problems and/or a form of psychopathology. It's generally illegal for these people to have guns, but unlike good people, they ignore gun laws -- just as they ignore laws against violence.

The "more guns means more murders" mythology also flies in the face of history. From the 1600s, American colonial law required that every household have a gun and that every military-age male be armed for militia service. Men too poor to buy guns were supplied with them by colonial governments and had to repay the cost in installments. To assure that every home and man was armed, officers periodically searched homes and men were required to muster with their guns. Despite this universal armament, murder was rare and few murders involved firearms.

Murder rates increased after the 1840s, by which time these armament requirements were no longer enforced and per ca pita gun ownership had become much lower. From the 1860s on, gun ownership increased sharply. Millions of men came home from the Civil War with their weapons; and firearms were even more widely distributed in the era of cheap pot metal guns (the "two dollar pistol") that followed. But this vast increase in guns -- much deadlier guns than ever before -- from the 1860s onward was accompanied by a substantially decreasing murder rate.

A few 19th century American states adopted gun controls because they had (and still have) severe violent crime rates. In most states, murders were few despite high gun ownership and virtually no gun control. Likewise, Europe had low murder rates prior to World War I despite high gun ownership and virtually no controls. Severe European gun laws appeared (for political reasons) in the tumultuous post-World War I era. Despite ever-stricter gun laws, both political and apolitical violence has increased apace in Europe.

If anything, a review of the European experience demonstrates more guns correlating with less murder. Nine European nations (including Germany, Austria, Denmark and Norway) have more than 15,000 guns per 100,000 members of the population. Nine others (including Luxembourg, Russia, and Hungary) have fewer than 5,000 guns per 100,000 members of the population. But the aggregate murder rates of these nine low-gun-ownership nations are three times higher than those of the nine high-gun-ownership nations.

Some groups, particularly the gun lobby, might argue that this shows how widespread gun ownership actually reduces violence rates. There is substantial evidence that this is true in the United States, where gun ownership for self-defense is very common. But there is no evidence that Norwegians, Germans and other Europeans often keep guns for defense.

The reason that European nations with more guns tend to have lower violence is political rather than criminological. Gun ownership generally has no affect on how much violent crime a society has. Violent crime is determined by fundamental economic and sociocultural factors, not the mere availability of just one of an innumerable bevy of potential murder instruments. Politicians in nations with severe crime problems often think that banning guns will be a quick fix. But gun bans don't work; if anything, they make things worse. They disarm the law-abiding while being ignored by the violent and the criminal. Yet nations with severe violence problems tend to have severe gun laws. By the same token, the murder rates in handgun-banning U.S. cities -- New York, Chicago, Washington, D.C. -- are far higher than in states like Pennsylvania and Connecticut, where handguns are legal and widely owned.

In sum, banning guns to the general public increases people's vulnerability and fails to reduce violence because the law-abiding citizenry are victims of violent crime, not perpetrators. Banning guns to felons, violent misdemeanors, juveniles and the insane (which our laws already do) is a good idea in general, though such laws are very difficult to enforce. Disarming those who only want to defend themselves, however, is a surefire road to empowering criminals at the expense of the innocent.


Something I came across on H23.

I do disagree that banning firearms to juveniles, felons, etc. is a good idea. They do not lose their basic human rights for life just because of either screwing up or not being old enough.

  • Mood: Neutral
  • Listening to: My radio
  • Reading: Nothing.
  • Watching: nothing
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

A livejournal thingie

Journal Entry: Tue Jul 8, 2008, 5:30 AM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, I finally broke down and created a livejournal. I'll give out the URL on request through notes.

The "mood thingie" is still buggy and doesn't seem to want to change.
  • Mood: Pride
  • Listening to: My radio
  • Reading: The full case, to see what else good is there
  • Watching: nothing
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

Obama

Journal Entry: Sun Jul 6, 2008, 8:23 PM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Taken from the Confederate Yankee([link]), for he's on the ball pretty well about this

Democratic Presidential candidate Barack Obama is on a tour across America designed to rehabilitate his reputation, after a CNN poll conducted on June 26-29 revealed that a surprising number of Americans—Democrats (10%), Independents (29%), and Republicans (40%), or 25% overall—say that the candidate lacks patriotism.

I must wonder how much a string of speeches will do to convince people that Obama loves America. They are, after all, "just words."

He certainly loves parts of America. San Francisco. Chicago. New York. D.C. University towns and union enclaves. Where left wing ideologies and identity politics hold sway, you'll find a part of America that Obama likes and understands.

The rest of the nation may as well be another world for the freshman Senator, as remote to him as the Indonesian schools of his youth are to the rest of us.

He doesn't seem to understand that the America outside of his comfort zone doesn't associate the sincerity or depth of love with this nation with fealty to the political party in charge at the time. He's used to seeing feckless American liberals threaten to leave the country if a Republican wins an election—though regrettably, few of these fickle souls live up to their word—and associates that as a normal behavior. Instead of "My country, right or wrong," his life story is a tale replete with a string of associates and mentors that boldly proclaim "my country, my way, or God damn you all."

Speeches are nice, and he certainly plays a teleprompter as lyrically as a human being can.

But Barack Obama has lived his life in the counterculture of America. He counts among his greatest influences a communist poet, a lynching advocate priest, a crackpot conspiracy-mongering reverend, and the detritus remnants of the last great experiment in American self-loathing.

The majority of Americans have been raised with a nearly instinctual love of this nation that is not tied to who resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, and that doesn't associate pride or shame in their nation of birth solely on the policies and actions of elected officials that will blow away on an electoral wind.

The freshman Senator from Illinois is surprisingly insulated from the American experience, even as he claims to credit America for his success. He claims to believe in the America, but every policy he outlines, every dream he frames, is nailed to an ever-engorging government. A program for this. A policy for that. Restrictions here, entitlements all around, and a tax on both your houses to pay for it all.

Barack Obama is in love with the possibilities of American government. It's too bad he has so little trust in the American people.

The "mood thingie" is still buggy and doesn't seem to want to change.
  • Mood: Pride
  • Listening to: My radio
  • Reading: The full case, to see what else good is there
  • Watching: nothing
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

Iowa

Journal Entry: Sun Jul 6, 2008, 7:54 PM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Where are all of the Hollywood celebrities holding telethons asking for help in restoring Iowa and helping the folks affected by the floods?

Where is all the media asking the tough questions about why the federal government hasn't solved the problem? Where are all of the Hollywood celebrities holding telethons asking for help in restoring Iowa and helping the folks affected by the floods?

Where is all the media asking the tough questions about why the federal government hasn't solved the problem? Why aren't they asking where the FEMA trucks (and trailers) are?

Why isn't the Federal Government relocating Iowa people to free hotels in Chicago?

When will Spike Lee say that the Federal Government blew up the levees that failed in Des Moines?

Where are Sean Penn and the Dixie Chicks?

Where are all the looters stealing high-end tennis shoes and big screen television sets?

When will we hear Governor Chet Culver say that he wants to rebuild a "vanilla" Iowa, because that's the way God wants it?

Where is the hysterical 24/7 media coverage complete with reports of cannibalism?

Where are the people declaring that George Bush hates white, rural people?

How come in 2 weeks, you will never hear about the Iowa flooding ever again?

The "mood thingie" is still buggy and doesn't seem to want to change.
  • Mood: Pride
  • Listening to: My radio
  • Reading: The full case, to see what else good is there
  • Watching: nothing
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

Jehova's Wittnesses

Journal Entry: Fri Jul 4, 2008, 11:27 AM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't understand why so many people hate them. They're fun to talk to and pretty straight up. Today I had a little mini-discussion with some, and it was another enjoyable discussion.

The "mood thingie" is still buggy and doesn't seem to want to change.
  • Mood: Pride
  • Listening to: My radio
  • Reading: The full case, to see what else good is there
  • Watching: nothing
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

A quiz stolen from Joi

Journal Entry: Mon Jun 30, 2008, 9:22 PM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Who are you?

2. Are we friends?

3. When and how did we meet?

4. How have I affected you?

5. What do you think of me?

6. What's the fondest memory you have of me?

7. How long do you think we will be friends?

8. Do you love me?

9. Do you have a crush on me?

10. Would you kiss me?

11. Would you hug me?

12. Would you ever make out with me?

13. Physically, what stands out?

14. Emotionally, what stands out?

15. Do you wish I was cooler?

16. On a scale of 1-10, how hot am I?

17. Give me a nickname and explain why you picked it.

18. Am I lovable?

19. How long have you known me?

20. Describe me in one word.

21. What was your first impression?

22. Do you still think that way about me now?

23. What do you think my weakness is?

24. Do you think I'll get married?

25. What makes me happy?

26. What makes me sad?

27. What reminds you of me?

28. If you could give me anything what would it be?

29. How well do you know me?

30. When's the last time you saw me?

31. Ever wanted to tell me something but couldn't?

32. Do you think I could kill someone?

33. Do you think I would kill someone?

34. Are you going to put this on your deviant journal and see what I say about you?

The "mood thingie" is still buggy and doesn't seem to want to change.
  • Mood: Pride
  • Listening to: My radio
  • Reading: The full case, to see what else good is there
  • Watching: nothing
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

Back from the range

Journal Entry: Fri Jun 27, 2008, 11:40 AM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I went to the range today. Had only 80 rounds left that I could shoot(keeping 30 at home for defense). Used up all 80.

I shot like crap today. I need a higher magnification scope, because my eyes are bad.

Pics forthcoming.

The "mood thingie" is buggy and doesn't seem to want to change.
  • Mood: Pride
  • Listening to: My radio
  • Reading: The full case, to see what else good is there
  • Watching: nothing
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

This just in!!!!

Journal Entry: Thu Jun 26, 2008, 7:53 AM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The supreme court just decided on DC v. Heller. And guess what? We won! The court ruled that:

1. The DC bans were outright unconstitutional
2. The right to bear arms is an individual right
3. The phrase "to keep and bear arms" means to own firearms

That's three RESOUNDING VICTORIES!

*Dances and celebrates*

The "mood thingie" is buggy and doesn't seem to want to change.
  • Mood: Pride
  • Listening to: My radio
  • Reading: The full case, to see what else good is there
  • Watching: nothing
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

I got bored, so quiz thingie

Journal Entry: Thu Jun 26, 2008, 5:08 AM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Because I have nothing better to do...

If you are in my friendlist and comment in this journal, I will:

a) tell you why I befriended you
b) associate you with something - a song, a colour, a photo, a mental image, etc.
c) tell you something I like about you
d) tell you a memory I have of you
e) ask something I've always wanted to know about you
f) give you one piece of advice that might be useful to you

The "mood thingie" is buggy and doesn't seem to want to change.
  • Mood: Pride
  • Listening to: CCR
  • Reading: nothing
  • Watching: nothing
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

Bad moon rising

Journal Entry: Sun Jun 15, 2008, 10:48 PM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hope you got your things together, hope you are quite prepared to die. Looks like we're in for nasty weather. One eye is taken for an eye...

That is all...

The "mood thingie" is buggy and doesn't seem to want to change.
  • Mood: Pride
  • Listening to: CCR
  • Reading: nothing
  • Watching: nothing
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

Weaponeer entry

Journal Entry: Fri Jun 13, 2008, 6:18 PM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have video of my Weaponeer homebuilt challenge entry firing. The white shit is wadding.

[link]

  • Mood: Pride
  • Listening to: Nothing
  • Reading: nothing
  • Watching: nothing
  • Playing: With my new computer
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

Range trip

Journal Entry: Sun Jun 8, 2008, 3:04 PM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm going to go to the range in a week or two to prove a buddy of mine wrong. He claims that his AR is 400% better than my SKS, meaning that his AR can shoot .5" groups or that the SKS can't shoot better than 4MOA. The SKS is a 2MOA gun at best, so I'm going to prove it.

We're going to use Wolf, which is crap ammo but it'll do. I'll post pics here of my targets.

  • Mood: Pride
  • Listening to: Nothing
  • Reading: nothing
  • Watching: nothing
  • Playing: With my new computer
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

I make a lot of journals

Journal Entry: Sat Jun 7, 2008, 5:43 AM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Obama being the Democratic presidential candidate for less than 24 hours already has had one of his fundraiser's Found Guilty on 16 Counts in Corruption Trial.

A federal jury has found a prominent political fundraiser for Sen. Barack Obama and Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich guilty of 16 of 24 counts in his Illinois corruption trial.

Antoin "Tony" Rezko was accused of scheming to get bribes from businesses seeking state contracts.

The jury delivered its verdict Wednesday after a nine-week trial.

Rezko has known Obama since he entered politics and was involved in a 2005 real estate deal with the Democratic presidential candidate, although testimony barely touched on their relationship. Most of the focus was on shakedowns prosecutors said Rezko arranged when he was a top adviser to Blagojevich.

Yup.... I guess CHANGE means 100% government corruption. Seems like Obama's friends list is a whos who of terrorists, anti-americans, and criminals.

If he gets voted into office I guess you can say americans deserve it.

"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK. That's not leadership. That's not going to happen." Barack Obama

"What I value most about Pastor Wright is not his day-to-day political advice. He's much more of a sounding board for me to make sure that I am speaking as truthfully about what I believe as possible and that I'm not losing myself in some of the hype and hoopla and stress that's involved in national politics." Barack Obama

"And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations,"

Obama, asked if homosexuality was immoral, in the wake of comments by Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Gen. Peter Pace, sidestepped the question. After pressure from gay groups, Obama issued a statement stating he did not agree with Pace "that homosexuality is immoral."

Last May, in the wake of the deadly Kansas tornado, Obama said "Ten thousand people died - an entire town destroyed". The death toll was actually 12 people.

Obama just last week referred to the ';president' of Canada. Canada has a prime minister, not a president.

Lets not forget Obama's suggestion this month that America has 57 states, and his bizarre statement in a Memorial Day speech in New Mexico that America's "fallen heroes" were present and listening to him in the audience.

Last year in Selma, Ala., for example, he said that his birth was inspired by events there which took place four years after he was born

His denial last April that it was his handwriting on a questionnaire in which, as a state senate candidate, he favored a ban on handguns. His campaign now contends that, even if it was his handwriting, this doesn't prove he read the full questionnaire.

Mr. Obama told a Portland, Ore., crowd this month that Iran doesn't "pose a serious threat to us," saying that "tiny countries" with small defense budgets aren't much to worry about. But Iran has almost one-fourth the population of the U.S. and is well on its way to developing nuclear weapons. The next day Mr. Obama had to reverse himself and declare he had "made it clear for years that the threat from Iran is grave."

"You know, when the massacre happened at Virginia Tech, I think all of us were grief stricken and shocked by the carnage. But in this year alone, in Chicago, we've had 34 Chicago public school students gunned down and killed. And for the most part, there has been silence. We know what to do. We've got to enforce the gun laws that are on the books. We've got to make sure that unscrupulous gun dealers aren't loading up vans and dumping guns in our communities, because we know they're not made in our communities. There aren't any gun manufacturers here, right here in the middle of Detroit. But what we also have to do is to make sure that we change our politics so that we care just as much about those 30-some children in Chicago who've been shot as we do the children in Virginia Tech. That's a mindset that we have to have in the White House and we don't have it right now.

As a general principle, I believe that the Constitution confers an individual right to bear arms. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right, in the same way that we have a right to private property but local governments can establish zoning ordinances that determine how you can use it."

Keep in mind... Obama is a Harvard graduate

  • Mood: Disbelief
  • Listening to: Nothing
  • Reading: nothing
  • Watching: nothing
  • Playing: With my new computer
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

How is this paranoid?

Journal Entry: Thu Jun 5, 2008, 12:30 PM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It has come to my attention that preparing for a disaster and wanting to protect one's self and loved ones is "paranoid".

HOW THE FUCK IS THAT PARANOID? Tell me. Is it because I expect things to be as bad as they can get? Is it because I have a desire to make sure I don't wind up dead or starving to death?

Could someone PLEASE tell me?

  • Mood: Disbelief
  • Listening to: Nothing
  • Reading: nothing
  • Watching: nothing
  • Playing: With my new computer
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

Writing

Journal Entry: Tue Jun 3, 2008, 3:13 AM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I apologize for not being as frequent with my writing as I was when I started and also for skipping ahead in time so much. It's kinda needed, because having a one for each day is too creatively draining.

So, what do y'all think of my writing so far? Should I keep going?

  • Mood: Neutral
  • Listening to: Nothing
  • Reading: nothing
  • Watching: nothing
  • Playing: With my new computer
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

This is just fucked up.

Journal Entry: Sat May 31, 2008, 1:08 PM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[link]

So, apparently banning handguns and swords and such isn't working. Now the UK is trying to ban knives! :lol:

Sadly, those same ideas are starting to permeate America as well, we're on the same path to tyranny and chaos the UK is, just not as far gone.

This is another good reason to not let Obama get elected. Or Clinton for that matter.

  • Mood: Wow!
  • Listening to: Nothing
  • Reading: nothing
  • Watching: nothing
  • Playing: With my new computer
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

Computer upgrading

Journal Entry: Wed May 28, 2008, 10:06 PM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm running up how much it'll cost to turn my computer into something very, very powerful(by my standards).

Maxing out RAM(need 2 more GB)

Second Video card

Second HDD, this one 500gb

Powerful bilge blower from a boat for cooling

External 500gb HDD for sensitive data storage

Cables for it all

100 ft of CAT-5 network cable

Trackball mouse


Total cost=350$

Donations are being accepted.

This will give me a very handy computer for my system. Lots of space to store data(bringing me up to 1320 gb total), lots of RAM, space for a second monitor and for a TV hookup, nice mouse. Since I'll be doing it with Linux, it will be blazing fast.

The external drive will be encrypted.

  • Mood: Wow!
  • Listening to: Nothing
  • Reading: nothing
  • Watching: nothing
  • Playing: With my new computer
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water

Read

Journal Entry: Mon May 26, 2008, 2:43 AM
I'd like to thank :iconsoulful-tears: for her donation of a sub! Your donation is much appreciated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[link]

Man, I think I'm starting to love Aus.

  • Mood: Wow!
  • Listening to: Nothing
  • Reading: nothing
  • Watching: nothing
  • Playing: With my new computer
  • Eating: nothing
  • Drinking: Water