Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
[x]

deviantART

 

First Montana, then Texas, and now South Carolina!

Wed May 13, 2009, 8:10 PM
WOOT. Now, if only we could get this done in FL!







[link]
[link]


Firearms Freedom Act Introduced in South Carolina

Posted on 12 May 2009

Introduced in the South Carolina State Senate on May 6, 2009, the “Firearms Freedom Act” (s-794) seeks “to provide that a firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured and retained in South Carolina is exempt from federal regulation under the commerce clause of the Constitution of the United States.”

The bill is sponsored by South Carolina State Senators Bright, Bryant, Mulvaney, Davis, Shoopman, S. Martin and McConnell. They join Montana, Utah, and Texas in an effort to limit federal regulation of guns, and specifically invoke the 9th and 10th Amendments as restrictions on federal power:

“the regulation of intrastate commerce is vested in the states under the ninth and tenth amendments to the United States Constitution, particularly if not expressly preempted by federal law. Congress has not expressly preempted state regulation of intrastate commerce pertaining to the manufacture on an intrastate basis of firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition”

Read the full text of the legislation below:

A BILL TO AMEND CHAPTER 31, TITLE 23 OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO FIREARMS, BY ADDING ARTICLE 9, THE “SOUTH CAROLINA FIREARMS FREEDOM ACT”, TO PROVIDE THAT A FIREARM, FIREARM ACCESSORY, OR AMMUNITION MANUFACTURED AND RETAINED IN SOUTH CAROLINA IS EXEMPT FROM FEDERAL REGULATION UNDER THE COMMERCE CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

Whereas, the tenth amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees and reserves for the states all powers not granted to the federal government in the Constitution; and

Whereas, the ninth amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees to the people rights not granted in the Constitution and reserves to the people of South Carolina certain rights. The guaranty of those rights is a matter of contract between the state and people of South Carolina and the United States; and

Whereas, the regulation of intrastate commerce is vested in the states under the ninth and tenth amendments to the United States Constitution, particularly if not expressly preempted by federal law. Congress has not expressly preempted state regulation of intrastate commerce pertaining to the manufacture on an intrastate basis of firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition; and

Whereas, the second amendment to the United States Constitution reserves to the people the right to keep and bear arms as that right was understood at the time that South Carolina was admitted to statehood in 1788, and the guaranty of the right is a matter of contract between the state and people of South Carolina and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by South Carolina and the United States in 1788; and

Whereas, Article I, Section 20 of the South Carolina Constitution clearly secures to South Carolina citizens, and prohibits government interference with, the right of individual South Carolina citizens to keep and bear arms. This constitutional protection is unchanged from the 1895 South Carolina Constitution, which was approved by Congress and the people of South Carolina, and the right exists as it was understood at the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by South Carolina and the United States in 1895. Now, therefore,

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION 1. Chapter 31, Title 23 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

“Article 9

South Carolina Firearms Freedom Act

Section 23-31-700. This article may be cited as the ‘South Carolina Firearms Freedom Act’.

Section 23-31-705. For purposes of this article:

(1) ‘Borders of South Carolina’ means the boundaries of South Carolina described in Article I, Section 1 of the 1895 South Carolina Constitution.

(2) ‘Firearms accessories’ means items that are used in conjunction with or mounted upon a firearm but are not essential to the basic function of a firearm, including, but not limited to, telescopic or laser sights, magazines, flash or sound suppressors, folding or aftermarket stocks and grips, speedloaders, ammunition carriers, and lights for target illumination.

(3) ‘Generic and insignificant parts’ includes, but is not limited to, springs, screws, nuts, and pins.

(4) ‘Manufactured’ means that a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition has been created from basic materials for functional usefulness, including, but not limited to, forging, casting, machining, or other processes for working materials.

Section 23-31-710. (A) A personal firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or privately in South Carolina and that remains within the borders of South Carolina is not subject to federal law or federal regulation, including registration, under the authority of Congress to regulate interstate commerce.

(B) This section applies to a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured in South Carolina from basic materials and that can be manufactured without the inclusion of any significant parts imported from another state.

(1) Generic and insignificant parts that have other manufacturing or consumer product applications are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition.

(2) Basic materials such as unmachined steel and unshaped wood are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition.

(C) Basic materials are subject only to intrastate commerce regulation.

(D) Firearms accessories that are imported into South Carolina from another state and that are subject to federal regulation as being in interstate commerce do not subject a firearm to federal regulation under interstate commerce because they are attached to or used in conjunction with a firearm in South Carolina.

Section 23-31-715. This article does not apply to the following:

(1) a firearm that cannot be carried and used by one person;

(2) a firearm that has a bore diameter greater than one and one half inches and that uses smokeless powder, not black powder, as a propellant;

(3) ammunition with a projectile that explodes using an explosion of chemical energy after the projectile leaves the firearm; or

(4) a firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with one activation of the trigger or other firing device.

Section 23-31-720. A firearm manufactured or sold in South Carolina under must have the words ‘Made in South Carolina’ clearly stamped on a central metallic part, such as the receiver or frame.”

SECTION 3. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.

  • Mood: Joy
  • Listening to: Nothing
  • Reading: Frugals
  • Eating: An apple
  • Drinking: Water

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 1 1 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:icon5-7x28mm:
Cool, but I can't think of any notable manufacturers who actually make guns in those states. Most of the major manufacturers have their factories in states where such an act would never pass.

I remember talking to a bunch of people from Montana when they passed this, and after a few seconds of, "Yeah! We're free from stupid laws!" they realized "Oh, it has to be made in Montana? Well nothing's really made in Montana... Fuck."

Also I love the note at the bottom: "BTW, this doesn't apply to machine guns or big-bore DDs." Then WTF does it apply to? The people of South Carolina can now put foregrips on their pistols? Whoopdeefuckingdo, even Canadians can do that.

--
You are the reason daddy drinks.
:iconpaulstrealer:
This does apply to DD's up to 1.5"(and in SC's case, no limit at all for black powder, so you could legally have a 155mm howitzer if it was BP). FA hasn't been done yet, only because you need to take it in steps. use this to establish precedent, then go from there for FA.

Right now it(in the SC case) would allow foregrips on pistols, shortbarreled shotguns and rifles(pistols with stocks), silencers of all kinds, etc. It would also bypass a great many inane laws regarding homebuilding.

Also, you can expect homebuilding to flourish in those states, and gun companies to actually start up there.

--
Educate yourself [link]

I'm just another bitter white person clinging to my god and my gun.
:icon5-7x28mm:
Well...I wish SC and all those other states well. Even though we need to register everything up here in Canuckistan we can already have SBRs, SBSs, and grips all over the damn place (also MGs if you owned one before they were banned :roll:).

Meh...hopefully gun control will start to turn around soon. It was enacted almost overnight so maybe one day it'll vanish just as quick.

--
You are the reason daddy drinks.
:iconpaulstrealer:
It won't go quick. It'll be a slow effort, both there and in the US. Once it's done, though, it'll be done for a couple generations at least.

--
Educate yourself [link]

I'm just another bitter white person clinging to my god and my gun.
:iconpvtserrano:
Too bad my home state of California'll never pass anything like this. Too many wimps afraid of big booms (in the cities anyways. The people out in the country are nothing like the pansies in Sacramento.)

Good thing I have residency in Utah. I got all my long guns there the same day I paid for them with only the minimum background check fee required.

Then I came home. To buy a shotgun there's a 10 day waiting period and a $25 dollar background check. I swear, this state is all sorts of jacked up.

--
Why do they call it "common sense" when it's so uncommon?
:iconomahanebraska:
Montana's law is going to get kicked up to the supreme court and it isn't strong enough to get through, at least I don't think so. All we can do is hope the other states that pass these put a little more insulation into the thing so that at least one of them gets passed through and the remaining states can follow suit.

--
I speak of the pompitous of love
:iconpaulstrealer:
The Supremes are likely, in my opinion, to affirm this. Simply because the bills require that all parts be made in-state, and that the finished product be so marked. The reason it didn't work with the cali-pot thing was because you can't tell california pot from out of state pot. You can tell a "made in montana" gun apart from another easy.

--
Educate yourself [link]

I'm just another bitter white person clinging to my god and my gun.
:iconfrancine1991:
:thumbsup: Enjoy!

--
...and you can consider that the end of the matter.
:iconomahanebraska:
It doesn't matter, the interstate commerce clause is usually interpreted to mean that there is trade of any sizeable material required to make it between states, OR that it may, someday, somehow, MAYBE effect interstate commerce. All of the laws that I've seen so far have no way to insulate their market from outside of the state, meaning that I as a Nebraskan citizen could drive to Montana and purchase a Montana gun and then take it home which the Supreme Court would count as interstate trade. While you may be able to tell what gun is made in Montana or South Carolina you can't prove that they are staying there, and unless the states require you to register the gun with the state they have no way to really track who is purchasing the guns and where they are from. They'd also have to set up checkpoints on all of the borders of the state, something the fedzilla is not going to fund, and let's just be honest here, our states are all broke.

I really do think it's a dud. The Feds have really covered all their bases and made such wide interpretations of that one clause that the only way to really enact something like this would be to amend the constitution directly with something that supports and expands on the 2nd amendment.

--
I speak of the pompitous of love

Sponsored By Ninja Assassin

Journal History

Site Map